Performance Appraisal
The technique of Performance Appraisal has been
widely adopted in many organizations to measure and evaluate the performance of
their employees across all job categories.
Performance Appraisal is one of most important
Human Resource practices and it is one of the most heavily researched topics
(Fletcher 2001). According to Fletcher, the Performance Appraisal must be
viewed as a mechanism for developing and motivating people in an organisation.
Performance Appraisal usually involves evaluating
performance based on the judgements and opinions of subordinates, peers,
supervisors, other managers and even workers themselves (Jackson and Schuler
2003). Generally an appraisal, performance review or a career development discussion
is a method by which the job performance of an employee is evaluated in terms
of quality, quantity, cost & time. The method of performance appraisals and
regular reviews of employee performance within an organisations is being widely
adopted. As a process, performance appraisal is seen as a key contributor to
successful human resource management, as it is strongly related to
organisational performance (Erdogan 2002).
![]() |
| Figure 01 |
With Performance Appraisals in groups, the
group is known to push each member to perform at his or her highest level and
thus members may be heavily motivated to participate in Performance Appraisals.
Research has shown that the Performance Appraisal must have a positive purpose
and employees must be participants in the Performance Appraisal if they are to
improve their job performance (Vasset et al 2012).
As mention by Kuvaas (2006) Researchers
acknowledge that there are a number of problems connected to Performance
Appraisal. The reasons include poor design, lack of attention to the organisation
culture and unwillingness to confront issues of poor performance as well as
time pressure.
In the last decade, researchers have moved away
from a narrow focus on feedback and evaluation from manager towards the more
developmental and motivational aspects of Performance Appraisal (Fletcher
2001). “Feedback” is often seen as recognition for good performance and can increase
inner motivation because it may reinforce the employees on competence and self-esteem.
Organisations are increasingly convinced and therefore
wish to invest ample time and innovation in undertaking the design and exercise
with care and transparency of performance appraisal, in order to minimize the
element of conflict and prejudice likely to influence the conduct of this
activity with objectivity.
References:
Erdogan, B (2002) Antecedents and consequences
of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management
Review.
Fletcher, C (2001) Performance Appraisal and
Management: The Developing Research Agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Jackson, S E and Schuler, R S (2003) Managing
Human Resources through strategic partnerships (8th ed.) Mason, Ohio: Thomson –
Southwestern
Kuvaas, B (2006) Different Relationships
between Perceptions of Developmental Performance Appraisal and Work
Performance, Personnel Review
Vasset, F Mamburg, E and Furunes, T (2012) Dyadic
Relationships and Exchange in Performance Appraisal, Vard I Norden.
Figure 01: https://www.slideshare.net/mohamadsharan/performance-appraisal-26783866
accessed on 2018-06-19 4:16AM

focused toward subject. good job
ReplyDeleteGood essay, keep it up..
ReplyDelete